If you’re going to be pedantic, I’ll pedant right back at you. It would be like answering “none of the above” when an answer is present that is correct according to Newtonian mechanics. The intent of the question is absolutely clear. Complaining about it because you can intentionally construct a counterexample that’s beyond the scope is posturing and pedantic. The test is clearly not intended for someone of your skill level, and is not intended to evaluate you. That doesn’t mean it’s a bad test, or that it shouldn’t be used to evaluate the target level of SW user. Could it be improved or better worded? Sure. Again, not saying you’re incorrect. Just being pedantic.
I don’t think anyone is suggesting that the question was meant to intentionally be ambiguous, unless we want to go down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole and say that Solid Professor wants you to do poorly so you will buy their product 
.
I could see myself second guessing what the correct answer would be due to “too much” experience 
. In my youth I’d likely not questioned it. I think an update to the picture to show sketch relations would address the issue.
Indeed. Especially since that is what is shown by default in SW which is what a novice user would see.
Just did the second part:
SolidProfessor-02.jpg
Relevant link for giggles. https://r1132100503382-eu1-3dswym.3dexperience.3ds.com/home?content=swym:prd:R1132100503382:qnaquestion:29a9BGeIRS-hf6sEpemhWA
LOL what kind of question is this? I had no idea what they were trying to ask, and the listed answer options didn’t help…
image.png
84% in 06:53 on the second part. I was tripping over the wording of the question more than anything else. And dropped marks on things I don’t use so…meh.
image.png
Here is mine, just missed one question as I misread it.
Hah. Nice to see resellers aren’t exempt from advertising checks notes SolidWorks related products on 3DSwym.
image.png
Yeah, I think they might have gotten away with it if not for the part where the “correct” answers are not shown but rather you’re referred to their training course.
I have gone through a lot of their material. Questions that are not as clear as I think they should be is one thing I encountered. I didn’t see anything that I thought would train in bad habits. We had it included in our subscription fee and if that was the only thing included in the increased subscription fee, I would have recommended that we go with the lower level subscription fee. I think it is a reasonable something to use for bringing people up to speed, but I would make sure to discuss all the company best practices and the whys of the best practices.